The American Family

I love old magazines, don’t you? They call out with promises of other lives not lived by me. But actually, once you give them a good flip through, you realize that life isn’t as different as you hoped it was in 1940 or 1955 or 1970. Sure, the print might be smaller and the cigarette ads larger, but in the end, just like in Woody Allen’s Midnight in Paris, we are longing for an era that didn’t really exist in the first place.
Take this fine specimen of Look magazine I found today. The date is January 26, 1971. The price is 35 cents. The headline is The American Family. Subheading: Is the family obsolete?

And here I thought this obsession with the definition of family was a 2012 kind of thing. I don’t remember hearing these debates about gay marriage in the 90s, but then again, I was in single digits for most of the 90s. Turns out the 70s was just as concerned about the breakdown of that sacred cow known as “the family.” The main op-ed starts with:
The family-the unit upon which our entire society is based-is being totally restructured. This shake-up is the most significant aspect of the underground revolution.
Try telling that to Rick Santorum. When discussing the moral failure of 70s youth, the article has this to say:
More and more are using drugs, as their parents do liquor, to escape tension and gain group acceptance. To compare them to the Lost Generation of the Prohibition era is too easy an out. The lawless twenties resemble a musical comedy beside the spiritually bankrupt seventies.
For my money, nowadays there aren’t enough comparisons being made to the “Lost Generation of the Prohibition era.” But the series is more than just lamenting lost morals. It actually has some rather progressive moments, including a guest appearance by Shirley MacLaine in a column which asks the question, “Is the Family Obsolete?” MacLaine says:
Our problem is not whether the family’s obsolete but whether the autocratic family is obsolete and, I think, yes, that’s so…It’s got to do with monogamy, with the male being the natural superior, with the belief that security comes in the form of possessions, with hoeing your own little row of potatoes, that sort of attitude…To whom does monogamy make sense? To a muskrat, maybe.
I can tell you right now, if Angelia Jolie were writing opinions like this, I’d be watching a heck of a lot more Tomb Raider. But by far, the most interesting piece in the series is a quiet feature called “The Homosexual Couple,” which finds two men living together no more revolutionary than a straight unmarried couple doing the same. After attending law school, one of the men decides to apply for a marriage license from the state of Minnesota. They are denied, and the man, Jack Baker, has this to say:
Straight and gay people both ask us why we can’t live together quietly and not cause trouble. The answer is simple: we want equal rights-whatever heterosexuals have, we want too.

The two men also attend mass regularly at a Catholic church, where their relationship is accepted. One time, during a sermon, Baker asked the priest:
Do you feel that if two people give themselves in love to each other and want to grow together with mutual understanding, that Jesus would be open to such a union if the people were of the same sex?
Look magazine writes-
There was a shocked intake of breath around the chapel. The priest hesitated a long moment and finally answered: “Yes. In my opinion, Christ would be open.”
And if Christ is open to gay marriage, the rest of America needs to hop on board. Welcome to the American Family 2012, baby.







